Case Reference: PIU-26-481

Lead Investigator: Porter Biggleswade

Assistant Investigator: Clarice Jones

Location: The Crown & Comet Hotel, Starling Bay, Cornwall

Investigation Period: 3 days / 4 nights

Classification: Reported Apparitional Activity / Former Seaside Hotel Investigation

Case Status: Closed - Explained

​

1. REFERRAL

The Crown & Comet Hotel is a substantial Victorian seaside property overlooking Starling Bay on the north Cornwall coast. Occupying a prominent position above the shoreline, the building was constructed during a period when coastal resorts were growing in popularity among affluent Victorian and Edwardian travellers.

The original hotel opened in 1896, established as a luxurious coastal retreat catering primarily to wealthy visitors arriving at the resort by railway. The arrival of the railway transformed access to previously remote coastal communities, enabling the hotel to attract guests from much farther afield. Its position overlooking the bay, together with its range of facilities and accommodation, suggests that the Crown & Comet was intended to rank among the resort’s more prestigious establishments.

At the height of its operation, the hotel was a substantial establishment comprising seventy-eight guest bedrooms together with two dining rooms, a ballroom, reading room and billiard room. Behind the public areas were extensive servants' quarters, kitchens and associated service spaces required to support a hotel of this size. A sea-facing winter garden also formed part of the property, providing guests with a sheltered area from which to enjoy views across Starling Bay regardless of the weather.

The Crown & Comet remained an important part of the local tourist industry for many decades. The building would have experienced a continual movement of guests, hotel staff, tradespeople and visitors, with its rooms and communal areas serving a wide variety of purposes throughout the course of its operational history. Over the years, successive generations of staff and guests passed through the property, creating a rich human history closely associated with the building.

The hotel remained in operation for almost a century. However, changing holiday habits, the gradual decline of rail travel, and growing competition from overseas destinations contributed to a prolonged decline in the hotel’s fortunes. As the traditional seaside holiday fell out of favour, the large Victorian hotel became increasingly difficult to maintain and operate at its former scale. The Crown & Comet eventually closed in 2004.

Since then, various proposals have been put forward to restore or redevelop the property, but repeated efforts to secure a viable future for the building have yet to succeed. As a result, much of the hotel has remained unoccupied for an extended period, leaving the structure increasingly disconnected from the purpose for which it was originally built.

The prolonged vacancy has also contributed to the site’s reputation as a place of interest. The ageing, empty building presents a stark contrast to the busy hotel it once was. Former spaces that were once occupied by guests and staff are now silent and unused, while parts of the property have reportedly deteriorated through age and neglect.

​

The Paranormal Investigation Unit (PIU) was contacted following reports from several people who had spent time in or around the property, including surveyors, trespassers and former hotel employees. These individuals reported a range of experiences and observations they regarded as unusual or unexplained. Their accounts led to PIU’s formal investigation of the property.

It is important to emphasise that reports of paranormal activity do not, in themselves, establish a supernatural cause. The investigation therefore aims to document reported experiences, examine the environments in which they occurred, consider conventional explanations where appropriate, and record any observations or evidence gathered during the investigation. The historical background of the Crown & Comet Hotel provides important context for understanding both the building and the reports associated with it.

Reported phenomena include:

• A woman seen roaming the upper corridors.

• Knocking from inside Room 209.

• The sound of a lift arriving when the lift was disconnected.

• Piano music heard from the ballroom.

• A guest-room telephone ringing despite the telephone system being removed.

• The smell of seaweed on side the upper floors.

• Wet footprints appearing outside Room 209.

• A figure visible in the winter garden after dark.

• Curtains moving in rooms with sealed windows.

• The sound of a bell from the old reception desk.

• A man's voice saying, "Checkout is at eleven."

• Objects apparently being moved between bedrooms.

• Repeated reports of someone standing at the end of the corridor on the second floor.

• Visitors experiencing dreams involving a hotel fire.

• A strong feeling of being watched near the former servants' staircase.

Of all the stories associated with the Crown & Comet Hotel, the most enduring centres on Room 209 and the alleged death of a woman named Kitty Thompson. According to local accounts, Kitty died in Room 209 during a severe storm in 1938. Following her death, her ghost allegedly roamed the hotel's upper corridors, apparently searching for a missing child.

Some versions suggest that the search continued repeatedly after her death, with the figure allegedly appearing at intervals along the same sections of corridor. Over time, the story became attached specifically to Room 209, establishing the room as the focal point of what would eventually become the hotel's best-known haunting legend.

The identity of the alleged child is less certain, with local accounts offering differing explanations. It remains unclear whether the child was believed to be a relative, a guest, or a later addition to the story. The inconsistency suggests that the narrative may have evolved through repeated retelling rather than from a single documented historical account.

Nevertheless, the story became sufficiently established in local folklore for paranormal groups to promote the Crown & Comet as one of Cornwall’s “most haunted hotels.” The claim subsequently appeared in promotional material and informal accounts, further strengthening the association between Room 209, Kitty Thompson, and the reported apparition.

Before accepting the story as a basis for investigation, however, PIU sought access to the hotel’s original records. The aim was to determine whether documentary evidence existed linking a woman named Kitty Thompson to the Crown & Comet and, if so, whether those records could corroborate the reported date, location and circumstances of her death.

This distinction was important. Although the legend had become well established locally, its popularity did not establish its historical accuracy. Stories repeated over generations can accumulate or alter details, potentially obscuring the original events. The investigation therefore treated the existence of Kitty Thompson, the reported 1938 death and the circumstances surrounding Room 209 as claims requiring verification rather than established facts.

Porter approached the investigation with characteristic pragmatism. As she put it: “If we’re going to spend four nights listening to a disconnected lift, I’d at least like to know whether the woman we’re looking for ever existed.”

The remark reflected a central principle of the investigation. Rather than assuming the reported haunting was genuine, the team intended to establish the site’s historical context first, then assess the reported phenomena against that background.

The search of the hotel’s original records therefore became a key preliminary stage of the investigation. If contemporary documentation confirmed that a Kitty Thompson was associated with the Crown & Comet in 1938, it would provide an independent historical basis for part of the Room 209 account. If no such individual could be identified in the surviving records, the origins and development of the legend would warrant closer scrutiny.

For the investigators, Room 209 represented more than the site of the hotel’s best-known haunting. It became a test case for the wider investigation: a story deeply embedded in the property’s identity, yet one that first required a basic question to be answered before any paranormal interpretation could be considered; was there a historical person behind the legend at all?

​

2. INVESTIGATION TEAM

Lead investigator: Porter Biggleswade (Senior Investigator, PIU)

Assistant investigator: Clarice Jones (Parapsychology student, All Saints University)

Historical Researcher: Dr Jean Bolt (Specialist in twentieth-century domestic and hospitality history)

Fire Safety Consultant: Stan Thomas (Former fire investigation officer)

Electrical Engineer: Toddy Strike (Consultant electrical engineer)

Conservation Specialist: Emily Hales

Dream Researcher: Dr Michael Riseman

Independent Observer:

Heather Burley (Representative of the Starling Bay Heritage Trust)

South Cornwall Paranormal Research Association - Two members (Kelly Rice and Sammy Peters) were permitted to observe the investigation. Their equipment and recordings were kept separate from PIU evidence until analysis was complete.

3. SITE DESCRIPTION

The Crown & Comet Hotel occupies a prominent position overlooking Starling Bay. Its elevated position gives the building an expansive aspect across the bay, while simultaneously exposing the structure to the prevailing maritime environment. The hotel's sea-facing elevation is characterised by large windows designed to maximise views across the water, a feature that would originally have contributed significantly to the property's appeal as a Victorian seaside resort.

The scale and layout of the building reflect its original function as a substantial late-nineteenth-century hotel. Although the property has been vacant for many years, the principal arrangement of the building remains recognisable, with a mixture of public, private and service areas distributed across several floors.

At ground-floor level, the principal areas include the reception space, main staircase, passenger lift, ballroom, dining room, winter garden, reading room and kitchen. These areas would historically have represented the principal social and operational spaces of the hotel, with guests moving between them throughout the day. The ballroom and dining room, in particular, would have accommodated large numbers of people during the hotel's operational period, while the winter garden provided a more sheltered environment overlooking the bay.

The upper floors contain the former guest accommodation. The second and third floors comprise numerous bedrooms and associated circulation spaces, including corridors and stairways. In addition to the principal staircase, the hotel contains a separate servants' staircase, reflecting the Victorian distinction between guest and service circulation. Further service areas include linen rooms and former staff quarters, providing an extensive network of spaces that would once have supported the day-to-day operation of the hotel.

Below the principal floors lies a basement level containing the boiler room and additional service areas. The property also incorporates service tunnels and concealed service voids associated with its original infrastructure. These areas are particularly relevant from an investigative perspective, as they provide routes through which air, sound, moisture and, potentially, wildlife can travel between otherwise apparently isolated parts of the building.

Access to the roof forms another component of the property's layout. The elevated roof spaces and associated access points are directly exposed to the coastal environment and therefore represent areas where wind, rain and temperature fluctuations may have a significant effect upon conditions within the structure.

Construction Materials:

The Crown & Comet Hotel is constructed largely from materials characteristic of substantial Victorian coastal buildings. Local stone and brick form the principal structure, supplemented by timber framing and internal elements, plaster finishes, cast-iron components and extensive glazing.

The combination of these materials gives the building a range of acoustic and environmental characteristics. Stone and brick, with their greater mass, transmit and reflect sound differently from the timber and plaster used internally. Cast-iron components and extensive glazing may also respond to changes in temperature, wind pressure and structural movement.

The sea-facing elevation contains numerous large windows overlooking Starling Bay. Originally intended to provide guests with light and expansive views, these openings now allow wind, rain and external sounds into the building where glazing is damaged or missing. In darkness, such sounds can be difficult to localise and may produce effects that are easily misinterpreted.

Condition of the Building:

After years of limited occupation and unsuccessful redevelopment attempts, the hotel has deteriorated significantly. Its coastal location has contributed to various environmental and structural problems, including salt corrosion, water entry, roof damage and widespread damp.

Broken glazing has left parts of the building exposed to the elements, while damaged roofing has allowed rainwater to penetrate the structure. Reports have also noted signs of structural movement and widespread deterioration of timber, plaster and other internal materials.

Animal intrusion is another consideration. A large, vacant building offers numerous opportunities for birds, rodents and other animals to enter and occupy concealed spaces. Movement within walls, ceilings, roof spaces and service passages could therefore produce unexplained noises or apparent movement, particularly when the building is otherwise silent.

The electrical infrastructure has also deteriorated through age and disuse. Degraded wiring, obsolete equipment and isolated electrical components may contribute to intermittent sounds, visual effects or local environmental changes. Any investigation involving electrical equipment must therefore consider the condition and safety of the existing infrastructure.

Environmental Considerations:

The hotel’s elevated position above Starling Bay creates several environmental conditions relevant to reports of unexplained activity.

The sea-facing elevation is regularly exposed to strong coastal winds. Air entering through damaged glazing, gaps in the building fabric, roof spaces and other openings can create localised draughts and pressure changes. In a building with numerous interconnected rooms, corridors and concealed voids, these effects may be detected some distance from their source.

The extensive network of service spaces presents a similar challenge. Tunnels, voids, ducts, staircases and other concealed passages provide numerous routes for sound and air movement. As a result, noise originating in the basement, service areas or elsewhere in the building may appear to come from a different location, particularly when the source is out of sight.

The combination of stone, brick, timber, plaster and metal construction may further complicate the acoustic environment. Wind acting upon windows and roof structures, movement within the fabric of the building, thermal expansion and contraction, falling debris and water movement can all produce sounds that may be difficult to identify without controlled observation.

For these reasons, the physical condition and environmental characteristics of the Crown & Comet are considered significant factors in the interpretation of any reported paranormal phenomena. The building's age, coastal exposure, structural deterioration and extensive concealed infrastructure provide numerous potential conventional explanations for sounds, movement, temperature variations and other unusual observations.

Consequently, these factors were taken into consideration during the investigation. Where possible, reported incidents were assessed in relation to the building's physical layout, prevailing weather conditions, sources of air movement, structural features, animal activity and the condition of the hotel's existing infrastructure. This approach was intended to distinguish environmental effects from observations for which no immediate conventional explanation could be identified.

​​

​

4. HISTORICAL REVIEW

The investigation into the alleged history of Kitty Thompson produced an immediate and significant problem. The original hotel records did not support the central claim upon which the Room 209 legend appeared to be based.

A search of the surviving guest registers and employment records for 1938 produced no entry for a woman named Kitty Thompson. There was no record of a guest by that name staying at the Crown & Comet, nor was there any corresponding entry among the hotel's employees. Further examination of the hotel's records revealed no death in Room 209 during that year. More significantly, there was no recorded death anywhere within the hotel during 1938.

The absence of supporting documentation presented a substantial difficulty for the traditional version of the story. If Kitty Thompson had died in Room 209 during the storm of 1938, as the local legend claimed, some indication of the event might reasonably have been expected to appear in the surviving hotel records. No such evidence was identified.

At this stage, the investigation team was faced with two possibilities. Either the records were incomplete and the event had occurred without leaving a surviving documentary trace, or the story had been incorrectly attributed to the Crown & Comet and subsequently developed through local retelling. There was insufficient evidence to establish which explanation was correct.

Rather than abandoning the historical investigation, Dr Bolt expanded the search beyond the specific claim. If the Kitty Thompson story had originated from a genuine incident, she reasoned, it might have become detached from the original event over time. Dates, names, locations and circumstances can all become distorted through repeated retelling, particularly when an old building acquires a reputation for being haunted.

The wider search produced a number of genuine incidents associated with the hotel. None matched the Kitty Thompson account precisely, but several provided potentially significant points of comparison.

In 1911, a seventy-year-old guest died peacefully in Room 118. The surviving documentation contains no indication of suspicious circumstances, accident or unusual activity surrounding the death. Although this was a genuine death within the hotel, it occurred twenty-seven years before the date associated with the Kitty Thompson legend and in a different room.

In 1927, a member of the kitchen staff was involved in an accident on the servants' staircase. The employee fell and sustained a broken arm. The incident was recorded as an accident, and there was no indication that the injuries proved fatal. The event nevertheless demonstrated that the hotel's extensive service areas had been the scene of serious accidents during its operational history.

The records for 1938 contained an incident that initially appeared considerably more relevant to the legend. During a severe coastal storm, the hotel's sea-facing windows were damaged. Several rooms were temporarily evacuated as a precaution, and the storm caused disruption throughout the property. However, despite the severity of the weather and the damage sustained by the building, no fatalities were recorded.

This discovery was particularly noteworthy because the storm forms an important element of the Kitty Thompson story. The historical record therefore confirmed that a severe storm had occurred and that the hotel had suffered damage to its sea-facing elevation in 1938. What it did not confirm was the death of a woman named Kitty Thompson.

Further incidents were identified in the decades that followed.

In 1944, during the Second World War, the Crown & Comet was temporarily requisitioned for military accommodation. Parts of the basement were subsequently converted for storage purposes. This period introduced significant changes to the hotel's normal operation and altered the use of areas that had previously formed part of the hotel's service infrastructure.

In 1956, a small electrical fire occurred behind the ballroom stage. The fire was contained and extinguished before it could spread through the building. No fatalities were reported. Although the incident was potentially serious, the available record provides no indication of any loss of life or unexplained circumstances associated with the fire.

A more unusual incident occurred in 1974, when a teenage guest named Layla Sutton disappeared from the hotel for approximately three hours. Concern was raised when she could not be located, but she was eventually found at the nearby railway station. According to the surviving account, Sutton had become upset following an argument with her parents and had left the hotel without informing them. She was unharmed and returned safely.

In 1982, the hotel's passenger lift became trapped between floors with three guests inside. The occupants remained inside the lift for approximately forty minutes before being released. No injuries were reported. The incident is nevertheless relevant to the investigation because the passenger lift remains one of the property's principal sources of reported mechanical and unexplained noises.

The final significant entry in the hotel's operational history occurred in 2004, when the Crown & Comet closed permanently. The final registered guest checked out at 10:43 on 31st October. The remaining contents and equipment were removed over the following weeks as the building was emptied.

Taken collectively, these records provided a considerably more complicated history than the local legend suggested. The Crown & Comet had experienced deaths, accidents, storms, fires, wartime occupation, disappearances and mechanical failures during its long operational history. However, none of the documented incidents corresponded directly with the account of Kitty Thompson dying in Room 209 during a storm in 1938.

The historical evidence therefore failed to establish Kitty Thompson as a genuine former guest or employee of the Crown & Comet, and no documentary evidence was found for a fatality in Room 209. At least on the basis of the surviving records examined, the central elements of the legend appeared to have no confirmed historical foundation.

However, the investigation did uncover one detail that attracted attention. It was not the absence of any reference to Kitty Thompson that proved significant, but rather the mention of the storm. The 1938 records confirmed that a severe storm had struck the hotel, that the sea-facing windows had been damaged and that guests had been evacuated from affected rooms. The event therefore provided a genuine historical incident occurring at precisely the time incorporated into the later legend.

For Porter, this raised a different question. If there had never been a recorded death in Room 209, why had a specific year, a specific room and a specific storm become attached to the story? The answer, if one existed, appeared likely to lie somewhere within the gap between the documented history of the Crown & Comet and the legend that had subsequently grown around it.

5. ROOM 209

The investigation took an unexpected turn when Dr Bolt further examined the surviving records relating specifically to Room 209. Although the historical search uncovered no evidence of a woman named Kitty Thompson, the room itself proved to have a far more unusual history than its seemingly minor role in the legend had initially suggested.

According to the hotel's original room schedules, Room 209 was not designated as a standard single or double guest room. It was listed as a family room and was equipped with two beds. A connecting door provided access to the adjoining Room 210, allowing the two rooms to function as a larger accommodation space when required.

On its own, this arrangement was unremarkable. Family rooms were a normal feature of large Victorian and early twentieth-century hotels, and the connecting door would have allowed parents and children to occupy adjacent rooms while retaining a degree of privacy. What attracted Dr Bolt's attention, however, was a recurring pattern in the hotel's records.

Between 1934 and 1942, staff repeatedly recorded requests for Room 209 to be kept available for returning guests. The wording of the entries varied, but the implication was consistent: particular guests appeared to have an established preference for the room and had requested that it remain available to them when they returned to the hotel.

The records did not identify why Room 209 was considered preferable, nor did they provide sufficient information to establish whether the requests came from the same family or from several unrelated groups. No special feature of the room was noted in the surviving accommodation schedules. There was no indication that it had a superior view, additional facilities or any other obvious advantage over neighbouring rooms.

Dr Bolt subsequently located a collection of handwritten housekeeping notes that provided an additional and considerably more intriguing detail. Several of the notes contained the same brief instruction: "Do not disturb after midnight." No explanation accompanied the instruction.

The wording was sufficiently unusual to attract attention, particularly because it appeared in more than one housekeeping record. However, there was still no indication of who was not to be disturbed, why the restriction applied specifically after midnight, or whether the instruction related to a particular guest, family or set of circumstances.

It was possible that the instruction had an entirely mundane explanation. Guests may have worked unusual hours, travelled overnight, suffered from disturbed sleep or simply requested additional privacy. Without further documentation, the phrase could not reasonably be interpreted as evidence of anything paranormal.

A second discovery, however, proved more difficult to dismiss as a simple administrative note. Within a 1937 housekeeping ledger, Dr Bolt found a handwritten entry concerning Room 209. It read: "Child sleeping in 209. Mother requested no entry."

Unlike the previous notes, this entry explicitly referred to a child occupying the room. It also recorded that the child’s mother had instructed hotel staff not to enter. No name was given, and the entry offered no further explanation: there was no indication of why the child was staying in Room 209, nor any information about the family’s identity. It did not state whether the child was ill, asleep, distressed, or simply being left undisturbed at the mother’s request.

Nevertheless, the discovery was significant because it established, at least temporarily, a documented connection between Room 209 and a child during the period in which the later legend was supposedly set.

The guest register for the relevant period did not offer an obvious corresponding entry, and the housekeeping note contained no surname or room-party information. The identity of the mother and child therefore remained unresolved.

More importantly, the discovery introduced a new element into the investigation. The traditional story concerned a woman supposedly wandering the corridors in search of a missing child. The historical records had failed to establish the existence of Kitty Thompson or any death in Room 209, but they had now produced independent documentation showing that a child had occupied the room in 1937 and that the child's mother had specifically requested that staff not enter.

The discrepancy between the legend and the surviving documentation became increasingly difficult to ignore. The date was wrong, the reported death could not be substantiated, and the name Kitty Thompson could not be found. Yet the records contained an unexplained reference to a child in Room 209, together with repeated instructions concerning the room's occupants and a recurring request that the room be left undisturbed after midnight.

None of these details constituted evidence of paranormal activity. They did, however, suggest that the later legend may have incorporated fragments of a genuine event or series of events whose original circumstances had subsequently been forgotten, altered or deliberately obscured.

For the investigation team, the question had therefore changed. The objective was no longer simply to determine whether Kitty Thompson had existed, it was to identify the occupants of Room 209 during the years in which the unusual housekeeping instructions first appeared and, in particular, to establish who the unnamed child and mother had been.

6. DAY ONE - BUILDING SURVEY

Following the initial investigation, Toddy undertook a detailed examination of the hotel's surviving electrical and mechanical systems. Given the age and condition of the building, particular attention was paid to determining whether apparently anomalous activity could be attributed to residual electrical connections, deteriorating equipment or the interaction between the hotel's original infrastructure and modern electrical systems operating in the surrounding area.

One of the first systems examined was the passenger lift. Although the lift motor itself had been disconnected and was no longer capable of operating the lift, portions of the original call-indicator system remained partially energised. Testing identified a faulty relay within the surviving circuitry which was capable of illuminating the indicator associated with the second floor.

This finding provided a conventional explanation for reports of the second-floor lift indicator appearing to activate despite the lift itself being disconnected. The relay could produce the visual indication without supplying the power necessary to operate the lift mechanism. In other words, an apparently active lift indicator did not demonstrate that the lift was moving or responding to an external command.

Explanation: Confirmed.

The investigation subsequently moved to the hotel's original telephone exchange, which remained in the basement. Although the exchange was no longer operational, several of the historic telephone lines remained physically connected within the building.

Testing indicated that these remaining connections could carry brief induced signals. Electrical interference originating from modern equipment outside the property could occasionally produce short tones through the old system. Such sounds could potentially be mistaken for a telephone ringing or other unexplained auditory phenomenon, particularly in the quiet conditions of the basement.

The precise frequency and duration of these signals appeared inconsistent, meaning that not every reported telephone-related sound could automatically be attributed to this mechanism. Nevertheless, the presence of a functioning physical connection between sections of the obsolete exchange and external electrical interference provided a credible explanation for at least some of the reported tones.

Explanation: Probable.

Emily conducted a separate examination of the hotel's windows, particularly those along the exposed sea-facing elevation. Initial observations suggested that several windows were fully closed, yet curtains within the rooms continued to move despite the apparent absence of an obvious draught.

Closer inspection revealed that several of the internal window frames had warped over time. Although the windows appeared closed from inside the rooms, they were not completely sealed. Small gaps remained around the distorted frames, allowing changes in external air pressure to affect the interior.

The hotel's exposed position above Starling Bay made this particularly significant. Strong coastal winds could produce considerable pressure against the sea-facing elevation, forcing air through relatively small gaps in damaged or distorted windows. Curtains could consequently move even when the occupants or investigators believed the windows to be securely closed.

The effect was reproduced during testing, providing a straightforward environmental explanation for reports of unexplained curtain movement and apparent draughts.

Explanation: Confirmed.

​

Another recurring observation concerned an intermittent smell described by witnesses as resembling seaweed or the shoreline. Given the hotel's position directly above Starling Bay, an external marine source was initially considered the most obvious possibility. However, examination of the building's lower areas identified a more specific source.

Damp seaweed had become trapped beneath sections of the foundations near the winter garden. Moisture and restricted airflow had allowed the organic material to remain concealed beneath the structure, where decomposition produced a persistent marine odour.

The location of the material also provided a plausible explanation for why the smell could appear to originate from inside the building rather than from the shoreline itself. Air movement through gaps and concealed service spaces could carry the odour into adjoining areas, making its apparent point of origin difficult to determine.

Explanation: Confirmed.

The final observation proved more difficult to resolve. The hotel's original piano remained in the ballroom. Years of neglect had left the instrument in a severely deteriorated condition, with significant deterioration to its internal mechanism. The investigation established that changes in temperature and humidity could cause individual components of the instrument to move or respond mechanically. Under suitable conditions, individual strings could vibrate without anyone deliberately playing the instrument.

This provided a plausible explanation for isolated notes or brief, indistinct sounds originating from the piano. It did not, however, explain reports that appeared to describe a sequence of notes resembling a recognisable musical phrase. During controlled examination, the investigators were unable to reproduce a complete musical phrase through temperature, humidity or other naturally occurring changes alone.

The distinction was important. The fact that the piano could produce isolated sounds without human intervention did not establish that every reported instance of piano music had the same cause. At the same time, the inability to reproduce a complete phrase did not constitute evidence of a paranormal source.

The piano therefore remained one of the few environmental observations for which the investigation could identify a plausible mechanism for some activity but could not satisfactorily account for the entirety of the reported phenomenon.

Explanation: Unresolved.

Taken together, the findings demonstrated the importance of examining the Crown & Comet's physical environment before assigning paranormal significance to individual observations. Several apparently unusual occurrences were subsequently traced to identifiable features of the building, including deteriorating electrical systems, residual telephone connections, warped window frames and concealed organic material.

The investigation did not, however, produce a conventional explanation for every reported event. The unexplained behaviour of the ballroom piano remained outstanding and warranted further observation under controlled conditions, particularly with environmental variables such as temperature, humidity, wind and building movement carefully monitored.

The results therefore supported a cautious approach: several apparently anomalous phenomena had identifiable environmental causes, while a small number remained unresolved pending further investigation.

​

​

7. NIGHT ONE - ROOM 209

Monitoring began at 18:00.

The investigation team established fixed monitoring positions throughout the areas considered most relevant to the reported activity, with particular emphasis placed on the second-floor corridor and Rooms 209 and 210.

Several cameras were positioned along the second-floor corridor to provide continuous visual coverage of the principal approach to Room 209. Audio recorders were installed inside both Room 209 and the adjoining Room 210, allowing investigators to compare sounds recorded within the two spaces and potentially determine whether apparent activity originated inside either room or elsewhere within the building.

Additional environmental sensors were positioned around the connecting wall between Rooms 209 and 210. These were intended to monitor changes in the local conditions and assist in identifying possible relationships between reported sounds and environmental factors such as temperature, humidity or movement within the structure.

At 20:17, a distinct knocking sound was heard from within Room 209. Two investigators were present and heard the sound independently, and the event was also captured by the recording equipment.

The sound initially attracted particular attention because of the room's established association with the hotel's reported haunting. However, subsequent examination of the building identified a likely conventional source. A loose section of pipe was located behind the wall, and its position and condition provided a plausible mechanism by which changes in pressure or movement within the building could produce an audible impact resembling a deliberate knock.

The available evidence did not allow the investigators to demonstrate conclusively that this was the source of the recorded sound, but the physical explanation was sufficiently credible to account for the incident.

Explanation: Probable.

At 21:03, the passenger lift indicator illuminated unexpectedly. The event occurred despite the lift itself remaining mechanically disconnected.

Rather than treating the occurrence as a new unexplained event, Toddy immediately compared it with the electrical findings established during the earlier examination. The previously identified faulty relay remained capable of energising the second-floor indicator independently of the lift motor and operating mechanism. The event was therefore consistent with the fault already identified within the hotel's surviving electrical system. No evidence indicated that the lift itself had moved or that the illumination represented an independent activation of the lift.

Explanation: Confirmed.

At 22:48, investigators recorded two distinct notes from the piano in the ballroom. At the time of the event, the building was unoccupied apart from the investigation team, and no investigator was positioned at the instrument.

Both notes were captured by the recording equipment. Environmental monitoring conducted simultaneously showed a significant change in humidity within the building.

The earlier examination of the piano had established that its severely deteriorated mechanism remained capable of producing individual sounds in response to changes in temperature and humidity. The environmental data recorded during this incident therefore provided a plausible explanation for the two notes.

Importantly, the event consisted of two isolated notes rather than the complete musical phrase described in some previous reports. The investigators were consequently able to identify a credible environmental mechanism for this particular occurrence, although this did not necessarily account for every historical report of music from the ballroom.

Explanation: Probable.

At 00:11, Porter reported seeing what she believed to be a woman standing at the far end of the second-floor corridor. She described the figure as wearing a dark dress and estimated the apparent age of the woman to be in her mid-forties. According to Porter's account, the figure appeared to be looking toward Room 209.

Porter subsequently described the figure as disappearing when she looked away. The observation lasted only briefly, and no physical interaction occurred.

Clarice, who was also present, reported seeing nothing unusual in the corridor. More significantly, the fixed corridor camera did not record a person occupying the location identified by Porter. No independent visual evidence could therefore be obtained to corroborate the observation.

The description was nevertheless notable in the context of the wider investigation. The reported figure was female, was observed on the second-floor corridor and appeared to be directing her attention toward Room 209, the same room around which the historical investigation had uncovered the unexplained housekeeping records concerning an unnamed child.

The similarity between the observation and the existing legend was recorded as part of the case history, but the investigators did not treat the coincidence as confirmation of the legend. Porter's experience remained a personal observation unsupported by the available photographic or video evidence.

Explanation: Personal observation - unverified.

At 01:26, a further potentially significant event was recorded inside Room 209. The audio recorder positioned within the room captured a short sound which, on initial listening, appeared to resemble a child's voice. The apparent word was interpreted by the investigators as: "Mama."

No member of the investigation team reported hearing a child's voice at the time the recording was made. The sound was therefore detected retrospectively through the recorded audio rather than as a directly observed event.

The recording was preserved in its original form for subsequent analysis. Dr Shaw was not present during this particular investigation, and the team therefore refrained from making a definitive identification of the sound in the field. No conclusion was reached regarding whether the recording represented a human voice, an environmental sound, an artefact introduced by the recording equipment or another source.

The apparent wording was also treated cautiously. Although the sound could be interpreted as the word "Mama", the investigators recognised that short, indistinct recordings can be susceptible to subjective interpretation, particularly when listeners are already aware of a location's history. For this reason, the recording was retained for later university analysis rather than being classified immediately as evidence of a paranormal communication.

Explanation: Unresolved.

By the end of the monitored period, several apparently unusual events had therefore been recorded, but their evidential status varied considerably. The lift indicator and the ballroom piano had plausible environmental or mechanical explanations, while the knocking in Room 209 was consistent with a known structural feature. Porter's visual observation remained unsupported by independent evidence, and the recording from Room 209 required further specialist analysis before any meaningful conclusion could be reached.

​

8. DAY TWO - THE FIRE

As the investigation progressed, Stan undertook a detailed reconstruction of the hotel's 1956 ballroom fire. The purpose of the reconstruction was not simply to establish how the fire had spread, but to determine whether the building's original construction could account for any of the unusual sounds, smells or changes in temperature reported by witnesses over the years.

Historical records indicated that the fire had originated behind a wall containing sections of the hotel's old electrical wiring. Although the fire itself had been contained before causing extensive structural damage, smoke had travelled considerable distances through concealed service voids within the building.

Stan's examination revealed that these voids were considerably more extensive than had initially been appreciated. Rather than terminating within individual rooms or sections of the hotel, several of the concealed spaces were interconnected. Routes existed between the ballroom, the second-floor corridor and a number of guest rooms.

This discovery provided an important potential explanation for several categories of reported phenomena. Sounds generated in one part of the building could travel through the concealed spaces and emerge some distance from their original source. A voice or conversation occurring in one room, for example, could potentially be transmitted through an otherwise inaccessible void and appear to originate from a neighbouring corridor or bedroom. The same principle could apply to knocking, impacts and other transient noises.

Odours could also travel through these spaces. Smoke during the 1956 fire had demonstrated that air could move through the network, while later environmental testing had established that smells originating in concealed or damp areas could similarly migrate through the structure.

The same network could potentially produce apparent footsteps. Movement within a service passage, basement area or another part of the building might produce vibrations that were transmitted through floors, walls and structural components. In a largely empty building, where ambient noise was minimal, such sounds could become particularly noticeable.

Temperature differences represented another potentially significant effect. Air moving through concealed voids could create localised changes in temperature, particularly where the passages connected areas with different levels of ventilation or exposure to the outside environment. A cold spot encountered within a corridor or room could therefore have a physical source elsewhere in the building.

The cumulative effect was to make the Crown & Comet an unusually complex acoustic and environmental environment. Its combination of thick masonry, timber floors, concealed passages, service voids and interconnected rooms meant that the apparent location of a sound could differ considerably from its actual point of origin. In practical terms, the building could function as a large acoustic chamber.

This discovery provided conventional explanations for a significant proportion of the hotel's reported phenomena. It also demonstrated why apparently isolated observations could not necessarily be treated as originating within the room or corridor where they were heard. But the investigation of the service network revealed something potentially more significant than the acoustic evidence.

While tracing the original service routes, the team identified evidence of a concealed passage running directly behind Rooms 208, 209 and 210. The passage did not appear on the later plans examined by the investigators and had apparently been sealed during renovation work carried out in 1968.

The existence of the passage was initially difficult to establish from the guest-room side. The renovations had concealed its entrances and incorporated sections of the original structure into later alterations. A surviving section of the passage, however, remained accessible from the basement.

The team subsequently entered the accessible section and discovered that the passage had not been completely cleared when it was sealed. Inside was an abandoned housekeeping cupboard.

The cupboard appeared to have been left in place when the passage was closed, with a small collection of objects still present. Among the items were quantities of old linen, cleaning equipment and several broken wooden or metal hangers. The objects were consistent with the passage's former use as part of the hotel's housekeeping and service infrastructure, however, one item immediately attracted attention.

Partially concealed among the discarded material was a child's shoe. The shoe was heavily deteriorated but appeared, on initial examination, to date from approximately the 1930s. Its condition made precise dating difficult, and the investigators did not regard its apparent age as conclusive without specialist examination. Nevertheless, its presence within a sealed service passage immediately behind Rooms 208–210 was considered noteworthy, particularly given the earlier discovery of the 1937 housekeeping entry referring to an unnamed child sleeping in Room 209.

The significance of the discovery was therefore recorded cautiously. There was no evidence at this stage establishing that the shoe had belonged to the child mentioned in the housekeeping ledger, nor was there any evidence connecting it to Kitty Thompson. It was simply an artefact of uncertain provenance that appeared to be contemporary with the period in which the unexplained Room 209 entries had been made.

The final discovery within the cupboard proved potentially more significant. Behind the old cleaning equipment, the investigators located a damaged hotel ledger. Portions of its cover had deteriorated, and several pages appeared to have suffered from moisture exposure. Nevertheless, enough of the document remained intact to suggest that it might contain information relating to the hotel's occupants or housekeeping activities. Given the absence of a documented Kitty Thompson and the unexplained references to Room 209, the discovery of an original ledger within a sealed service passage was immediately treated as potentially important.

​